Prediction of Miki Mizokuchi vs Ingelise Driehuis Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Mizokuchi vs I. Driehuis

Miki Mizokuchi

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

221

Best Rank

264

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ingelise Driehuis

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

221

Best Rank

264

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mizokuchi 1 - 0 Driehuis

They have played 3 sets in total, with Miki Mizokuchi winning 2 and Ingelise Driehuis winning 1. The last match between Miki Mizokuchi and Ingelise Driehuis was at the ITF Algarve, 12-06-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Miki Mizokuchi getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mizokuchi	1
Driehuis	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Algarve(06-12-89)

Stats

Miki Mizokuchi

Ingelise Driehuis

M. Mizokuchi vs I. Driehuis H2H Profile

M. Mizokuchi	Stats	I. Driehuis
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.20% (67-72)	Career Total W/L	46.06% (76-89)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Mizokuchi vs I. Driehuis Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miki Mizokuchi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ingelise Driehuis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miki Mizokuchi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ingelise Driehuis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Miki Mizokuchi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ingelise Driehuis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Miki Mizokuchi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ingelise Driehuis winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Miki Mizokuchi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 46/45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 5/10). Ingelise Driehuis has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 51% (W/L 6/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 23/35).
Player level: In the last year, Miki Mizokuchi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ingelise Driehuis has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Miki Mizokuchi winning 1 times and Ingelise Driehuis being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Miki Mizokuchi winning 2 and Ingelise Driehuis winning 1.
The last match between Miki Mizokuchi and Ingelise Driehuis was at the ITF Algarve, 12-06-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Miki Mizokuchi getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miki Mizokuchi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ingelise Driehuis has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miki Mizokuchi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ingelise Driehuis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Miki Mizokuchi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ingelise Driehuis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Miki Mizokuchi vs Ingelise Driehuis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Mizokuchi vs I. Driehuis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Mizokuchi	Stats	I. Driehuis
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	14
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Mizokuchi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Bilbao - 19-07-1993
R3 Neus Avila BonastreN. Avila	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ITF Vigo - 12-07-1993
R3 Caroline DheninC. Dhenin	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
R4 Sofia PrazeresS. Prazeres	L	6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Lohja - 05-07-1993
R3 Stephanie GompertsS. Gomperts	W	6-3 1-6 7-5	Stats
R4 Lisa McsheaL. Mcshea	L	6-3 6-0	Stats

View All

I. Driehuis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Eastbourne - 13-06-1994
R2 Manon BollegrafM. Bollegraf	L	3-6 7-5 6-2	Stats
Q1 Gemma MaginG. Magin	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
Q2 Mareze JoubertM. Joubert	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
Prague - 10-05-1994
Q1 Nino LouarsabishviliN. Louarsabishvili	L	6-2 6-7(5) 6-3	Stats
Hamburg - 25-04-1994
Q2 Kveta PeschkeK. Peschke	L	7-6(2) 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Mizokuchi vs I. Driehuis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Mizokuchi	Stats	I. Driehuis
48.20% (67/72)	YTD Win/Loss	46.06% (76/89)
48.39% (150/160)	Sets Win/Loss	47.53% (183/202)
49.14% (1350/1397)	Games Win/Loss	48.90% (1770/1850)
50.55% (46/45)	Hard Win/Loss	49.30% (35/36)
33.33% (5/10)	Clay Win/Loss	39.66% (23/35)
50.00% (11/11)	Indoor Hard W/L	46.67% (7/8)
33.33% (1/2)	Grass Win/Loss	45.45% (5/6)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
480.16	Average Opponent Rank	466.85
49.46% (46/47)	Challenger W/L	45.54% (46/55)
50.00% (3/3)	Futures W/L	60.00% (6/4)
48% (65/136)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (76/164)
40% (4/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	48% (10/21)
44% (16/36)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (26/57)
84% (70/59)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (70/59)
14% (70/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (70/11)
9% (68/6)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (94/17)